Quote
shady wrote:
refer to a locked thread? lol
the thing about philip, he claims hes the best player and also said multiple times he could 5v1 or something similar people and you just claimed you were one of the best players in rf, yet u lose to those people
sense?
and that could&would was based on that u surely arent gonna play toure and just say shit
and even if, in times where aimbot is spread it doesnt make too much sense anyway except u would record, but then prolly find excuses like philip did everytime ;>
could it be that your aussie?
[iq pic]
- Philip was the best player. And quite possibly still is (i'm unsure as of weather he still plays). Just because he has lost a game or two in his time doesn't mean he is not the best. Losing is just a way of improving. But when you lose consistantly to the same person(s) then its quite obvious who is the better opponent(s). I think Philip has shown more than enough evidence that he is / was the games best player recently.
- You're in no position to say weather I will or will not play. You're the goose who talked up 2v2ing Nick + Philip and offering a wager on it, showing your confidence, end refused to play them in the end? I have never backed away from an organized match. I feel no need to. If I lose fairly, then I lose fairly. If I lose unfairly, then of course I will be angry. Just like any other 'fair go' bloke on this planet.
- As for the IQ picture...
Please refrain from posting pictures without showing any hard evidence. I could easily photoshop a picture like that giving europeans an average of 60 iq. Hell I could do it with fucking MSPaint even.
Heres another pic I found on Wikipedia, too.
I'm not saying thats correct, but it shows how easily things are misinterperated online. Now now, before someone goes critisizing my spelling, grammar etc, i really don't give a fuck. My logic is acceptable and is quite obviously better than any of these euro fuckers.
They seem to be incapable of taking in the cold hard truth.